Stream flow analysis and comparison of methods for base flow separation : case study of the Modder River basin in central South Africa

dc.contributor.authorWelderufael, W.A.
dc.contributor.authorWoyessa, Y.E.
dc.contributor.otherCentral University of Technology Free State Bloemfontein
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-03T09:58:22Z
dc.date.available2015-09-03T09:58:22Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.date.issued2009
dc.descriptionPublished Articleen_US
dc.description.abstractA stream flow at an outlet of a catchment can be entirely a base flow or direct flow or a combination of both. The base flow component of a stream is mainly contributed from the ground water storage which often is an open aquifer whereas the direct flow component is mainly the result of a direct response of a rainfall event. The Upper Modder river basin catchment is considered to be the origin of the Modder River which supplies water to Rustfontein Dam, situated at the outlet of the C52A with an area of 928 km2. Nine years of daily stream flow showed a continuous none zero discharge throughout the year. During the rainy season the discharge of the stream increases significantly. Thus, it is necessary to separate the direct and base flow of the stream in order to understand the important component that is more likely to be affected by different land use changes in a catchment. The Modder river daily mean flow at the inlet of Rustfontein dam (in Central South Africa) was analysed using four base flow separation methods, the Nathan & McMahon (N&M), the Chapman, Smakhtin & Watkins (S&W) method and the frequency duration analysis. All the methods gave higher percentage of the low flow component, except for the S&W method which underestimated it. The N&M filtering equation gave base flow components greater than 66% in 1999 and increased to 84% in 2007 while the Chapman equation revealed 65% and 74% in 1999 and 2007, respectively. Similarly, the frequency duration analysis gave 62% in 1999 and increased to 79% in 2007. The frequency duration analysis gave up to 13% lower percentage than the N&M (1990) filtering equation. The nine year base flow averages are 69%, 69% and 75% for frequency duration analysis, Chapman (1999) and N&M (1990) filtering equations, respectively. The result revealed that the Modder River is largely supplied by the ground water discharge. The result seemed to concur with the fact that for a semi-arid catchment such as the Modder river basin, with an average annual runoff coefficient of approximately 6%, the contribution of annual rainfall to direct runoff is very minimal.en_US
dc.format.extent3 366 224 bytes, 1 file
dc.format.mimetypeApplication/PDF
dc.identifier.issn1684498X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11462/375
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherInterim : Interdisciplinary Journal, Vol 8, Issue 2: Central University of Technology Free State Bloemfontein
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInterim : Interdisciplinary Journal;Vol 8, Issue 2
dc.rights.holderCentral University of Technology Free State Bloemfontein
dc.subjectStream flowen_US
dc.subjectBase flowen_US
dc.subjectDirect flowen_US
dc.subjectFlow separationen_US
dc.titleStream flow analysis and comparison of methods for base flow separation : case study of the Modder River basin in central South Africaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Welderufael, W.A...pdf
Size:
1.85 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: